MATTER FOR 8.8.2012 COURT NO. 10 ITEM NO.
SEC.X
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION ( CIVIL) NO. 383 OF 2011
(UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA)
WITH
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1
(APPLICATION FOR STAY)
WITH
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 2
(APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT FILED BY BY MR. VIVEK SINGH, ADVOCATE)
AND
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 3
(APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT FILED BY MR. AMIT ANAND TIWARI, ADVOCATE)
AND
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 4
(APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT FILED BY MR. JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA,
ADVOCATE)
AND
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 5
(APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT FILED BY MS. K.V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA,
ADVOCATE)
AND
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 6
(APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS)
AND
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 7
(APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS FILED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NOS. 3 & 4)
AND
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 8
(APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS FILED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NOS. 3 & 4)
AND
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 9
(APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION FILED BY NAVNIT K. KHOSLA, APPLICANT-IN-
PERSON)
AND
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 10
(APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS FILED BY MS. ASHA G. NAIR, ADVOCATE)
AND
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 11
(APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE REJOINDER AFFIDAVIT FILED BY MR.
VIKAS MEHTA, ADVOCATE) AND
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 12
(APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION FILED BY MR. NAVNIT K. KHOSLA, APPLICANT-
IN-PERSON)
AND
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 13
(APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS FILED BY MR. VIKAS MEHTA,
ADVOCATE)
AND
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 14
(APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION & CLARIFICATION FILED BY MR. ANIL K.
TANDALE, ADVOCATE ON 24.7.2012)
AND
SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETTIION (CRL) NO..... OF 2012
(FILED BY MR. VIKAS MEHTA, ADVOCATE ON 8.5.2012)
AND
SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETTIION (CRL) NO..... OF 2012
(FILED BY MR. VIKAS MEHTA, ADVOCATE ON 8.5.2012)
SOLOMON JAMES & ORS. .....PETITIONERS
-VERSUS -
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....RESPONDENTS
OFFICE-REPORT
The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on
with office report dated 10.5.2012, when the Court was pleased to pass the
followning Order:-
âE?Heard senior counsels for the parties.
Mr. Shekhar Naphade, senior counsel submits that he will place
the records (made available with the Mediator) before this Court in a
sealed cover for our perusal.
We make it clear that pendency of this matter either before the
Mediator or before this Court will not hamper with the investigation.
I.A.No.13
Issue notice.
Ms. Asha G. Nair, accepts notice.
Learned counsel for the respondent sought time to file his
response to this application. Time is granted.
List all the applications along with the main matter on 8th
August, 2012 for final disposal.âE?
It is submitted that Mr. Anil Kumar Tandle, Advocate has on 24.7.2012
filed an application for intervention and clarification which has been
registered as I.A. No. 14. (copy enclosed)
It is further submitted that the matter above was mentioned before
this Hon'ble Court on 27.7.2012, when the Court was pleased to pass the
following Order:
âE?List on 8.8.2012âE?
It is submitted that an amount of Rs. 50,16,44,833/- plus interest is
lying invested in F.D.R. for 91 days on autorenewal basis which is going to
mature on 23.8.2012. (vide Court's Order dated 23.2.2012)
The matters above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court for
orders with this Office report.
Dated this the 7th day of August, 2012.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to:-
1.MS. K.V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA, ADV.
2.MR. VIKAS MEHTA, ADV.
3.MR. VIVEK SINGH, ADV.
4.MR. AMIT ANAND TIWARI, ADV.
5.MR. JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA, ADVOCATE
6.MR. NAVNIT K. KHOSLA, APPLICANT-IN-PERSON
7.MS. ASHA G. NAIR, ADVOCATE
8.Mr. Anil Kr. Tandale, Intervener
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| DISCLAIMER |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| OFFICE REPORT IS ONLY FOR ASSISTANCE OF THE HON'BLE COURT. ALTHOUGH EVERY EFFORT HAS |
| BEEN MADE TO GIVE UPDATED, CORRECT AND COMPLETE INFORMATION, BUT THE CORRECTNESS |
| OF THE CONTENTS OF THE OFFICE REPORT MAY BE VERIFIED FROM THE ORIGINAL CASE FILE. |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://courtnic.nic.in/supremecourt/temp/wc%20383rpt.txt
Comments
Post a Comment