Speak Asia: CLARIFICATION ON STAY ORDER



see the last paragraph of the 1st march(1st page) update given by Mr. Ashok Bahirwani, i.e. " It was interesting to note that Mr. Khosla was not forthcoming on his own, to inform the Hon'ble Court about his intervention application in WP/383/2011, he was forced to bring to the notice of the court his IA only on the say of our counsels. I really do not understand the ways of this gentleman."
 In my opinion with the discussion with some experts of law, the stay application is for this intervention application in SC for WP/383/2011, as now he is not eligible for that.
It is just an analysis.
 
STAY koi PRASAD nahin hai Jo koi bhi court se Maange aur MIL JAYE.
IS ke Liye 2 point bahut important hain
1. Balance of Convenience applicant ke Paksh me honi Chahiye,
2. Court ko convince kerna Padta hai ki IRREPAIRABLE INJURY / LOSS ho ga Applicant ko Ager STAY NIHI DIYA GAYA.
JO dono hi EOW ke Liye mushkil hai court ko convince kerna.
Panelist ko payouts se EOW ko kya nuksaan ho sakta hai, KYA KAHE GA EOW ?
Business Restart se EOW ko Kya nuksaan ho sakta hai, KYA BOLE GA EOW ?
EOW ka kaam hai Mamle ki investigation ker ke
Charge Sheet EVIDENCE ke Saath court me submit karna,
Baki Kaam Hai Court Ka.
Charge Sheet EOW se File nahi ho Pa Rahi, evidence ki kami ki vajah se.
jai speak asia

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Writ 1127 Full update

New Format Cheques to be valid from 31.12.2012

THINK TO BE POSITIVE WP/1127 DISPOSED